這應該是一篇論文, 下面這兩句結構一樣, 你翻譯出來卻不一樣, 我標示句子的結構讓你理解: (你這兩句翻譯中, 第二句才是對的, 但是少翻譯了with an opaque zone on the otolith edge)
Specimens collected in the third quarter, the fourth quarter and the first quarter were aged as number of opaque zones +0.25, +0.50, and +0.75 years, respectively.
But specimens with an opaque zone on the otolith edge collected in the first quarter were aged as number of opaque zones −0.25 years.
------------------
the age = number of opaque zones +0.25
年齡 = opaque zones 的數量 +(加上) 0.25
Note:
Opaque zones were counted under magnifications from 7.5x to 25.2x with a stereo-dissecting microscope with transmitted white light, or under reflected light against a dark background (Newman et al., 1996).
- Nov 15 Fri 2013 21:53
漁業相關..年齡成長問題
close
參考資料
專業術語我也不會翻譯, 抱歉
全站熱搜
留言列表